1. Aiwaka AdventuresHome
  2. Tech Trends

Controversy Arises Over Solana Network Outage

• Tech Trends • 100 views

On February 28, the Twitter user DBCryptoX released a controversial post about the network outage of Solana on February 25, indicating that a large number of v…

Controversy Arises Over Solana Network Outage

On February 28, the Twitter user DBCryptoX released a controversial post about the network outage of Solana on February 25, indicating that a large number of verifier messages and online voting are blocking the network. Anatoly Yakovenko, founder and CEO of Solana Labs, responded that his remarks came from “pure ignorance” and pointed out that as part of the “single large quorum”, voting helps to provide “excellent security, high throughput and low cost” at the same time. However, Yakovenko did not completely refute the claim of DBCryptoX that 90-95% of the transactions on Solana included these verifier messages and on-chain voting, which DBCryptoX believed would help “put the system into trouble”.

Founder of Solana Labs: The statement that voting on the chain causes network disruption is due to “pure ignorance”

Analysis based on this information:


The Solana network outage on February 25 has caused a lot of controversy on Twitter, thanks to a tweet from user DBCryptoX. According to the tweet, large numbers of verifier messages and online voting were blocking the network. While Solana Labs CEO Anatoly Yakovenko responded to the tweet, he did not completely refute the claim that 90-95% of transactions on the network included these messages and voting processes.

The controversy centered around the role of verifier messages and online voting in the Solana network. According to Yakovenko, these processes were necessary for providing high security, throughput, and low cost at the same time. The network operates as a “single large quorum”, and voting helps to provide the consensus necessary for maintaining the network.

However, DBCryptoX argued that this high percentage of verifier messages and on-chain voting could potentially cause problems for the network. The tweet also accused Solana of being centralized due to the concentration of power in the hands of a few validators.

This controversy highlights the challenges of maintaining a decentralized network that is both secure and efficient. Solana has positioned itself as a viable alternative to Ethereum, with faster transaction times and lower costs. However, as the network grows, it will face more challenges and scrutiny.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the Solana network outage reveals both the strengths and weaknesses of this decentralized network. While verifier messages and online voting may be necessary for maintaining the network, they also make it vulnerable to potential problems. As Solana continues to grow and evolve, it will need to find ways to balance security and efficiency to ensure its long-term viability.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent aiwaka's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.aiwaka.com/2023/02/28/controversy-arises-over-solana-network-outage/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.

Like (0)
Previous 02/28/2023 05:40
Next 02/28/2023 05:51

Recommended articles