The Chamber of Digital Commerce Opposes SEC’s Crackdown on Cryptocurrency Insider Trading

02/23/2023 06:23 • Metaverse Matters • 86 views

It is reported that in a non-party opinion statement submitted to the court, the Chamber of Digital Commerce, headquartered in the United States, believed that the insider trading case of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against the former employees of Coinbase should be rejected, because it represents the expansion of the enforcement and supervision movement of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and tried to characterize the secondary market transactions of cryptocurrency as securities transactions. The Digital Chamber of Commerce stressed that the US SEC had never been authorized by Congress to invade the digital asset market, and pointed out that in other cases of the Supreme Court, regulators must first be authorized by Congress.

American Digital Chamber of Commerce: The SEC’s insider trading case against former employees of Coinbase should be rejected

Analysis based on this information:

The Chamber of Digital Commerce, a US-based trade association that advocates for the adoption of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies, has submitted a non-party opinion statement to the court opposing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) crackdown on insider trading in the cryptocurrency market. The Chamber argued that the SEC’s case against former Coinbase employees, accused of illegally profiting from insider information, should be rejected as it is an expansion of the agency’s enforcement powers and attempts to regulate secondary market transactions of cryptocurrencies as securities transactions.

The Digital Chamber of Commerce’s statement highlights the lack of clear regulatory guidance on digital assets such as cryptocurrencies, which are still considered a relatively new and evolving asset class. The Chamber argues that the SEC has not been authorized by Congress to oversee the digital asset market and that its actions amount to an overreach of regulatory authority.

The Chamber’s position is consistent with the broader debate on how to regulate cryptocurrencies, which are decentralized and operate outside traditional banking and financial systems. While some argue that cryptocurrencies should be subject to the same regulations as traditional securities and commodities, others argue that they should have their own unique regulatory framework to account for their unique characteristics.

The Chamber’s statement also raises questions about how insider trading laws apply to the cryptocurrency market. The SEC’s case against the former Coinbase employees implies that cryptocurrency transactions should be treated as securities and subject to insider trading laws. However, given the lack of clear regulatory guidance on the status of cryptocurrencies, it is unclear whether insider trading laws should apply to cryptocurrency transactions conducted on secondary markets.

In conclusion, the Chamber of Digital Commerce’s statement highlights the complexities of regulating the cryptocurrency market and the need for clarity from regulators. The statement also underscores the tension between regulators’ desire to protect investors and ensure market fairness and the need to foster innovation in a nascent and rapidly evolving market.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent aiwaka's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.aiwaka.com/2023/02/23/the-chamber-of-digital-commerce-opposes-secs-crackdown-on-cryptocurrency-insider-trading/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.