Paxos Treasury’s BUSD Destruction: The Significance of Managing Stablecoin Supply
According to the report, Whale Alert monitoring data showed that at 02:12 on February 18, 2023 Beijing time, Paxos Treasury destroyed 89821823 BUSDs.
P…
According to the report, Whale Alert monitoring data showed that at 02:12 on February 18, 2023 Beijing time, Paxos Treasury destroyed 89821823 BUSDs.
Paxos Treasury destroyed 89821823 BUSDs
Analysis based on this information:
Stablecoins have become a fundamental component in the crypto market, serving as a reliable storage of value as well as providing users with a stable and standardized asset value. BUSD, a stablecoin issued by Paxos, one of the leading global crypto-asset platforms, has gained massive popularity.
The report citing the monitoring data of Whale Alert reveals that at 02:12 on February 18, 2023 Beijing time, Paxos Treasury destroyed 89821823 BUSDs. The destruction of such a massive amount of BUSD prompts a closer look at the dynamics of stablecoin supply management and its significance in the market.
Stablecoins are primarily designed to maintain their value in contrast to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, which are known for their volatile value. The value of stablecoins is pegged to tangible assets such as fiat currency, precious metals, or other cryptocurrencies. BUSD, in particular, is pegged to the US dollar, making it a reliable source of liquidity, a safe investment, and a useful asset in cryptocurrency trading.
However, stablecoins’ value maintenance comes with challenges, as a sudden increase or decrease in supply can significantly affect their value. Therefore, stablecoin issuers need to manage and monitor the supply to maintain a stable value for users.
Paxos Treasury’s destruction of 89821823 BUSD is an indication of the platform’s commitment to maintaining BUSD’s value, as well as avoiding the risks associated with excessive supply. Unlike traditional currency, BUSD’s stability is not influenced by the policies of regulators or central banks, but rather by the supply-control policies of the issuing crypto-platform.
In conclusion, the destruction of such a significant amount of BUSD by Paxos Treasury is a positive indication of the platform’s commitment to the stability and reliability of BUSD. Consequently, it highlights the importance of managing and controlling stablecoin supply to ensure efficient functioning of the market. Therefore, managing stablecoins supply should be a priority for issuers of stablecoins in the crypto market.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent aiwaka's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.aiwaka.com/2023/02/18/paxos-treasurys-busd-destruction-the-significance-of-managing-stablecoin-supply/
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.
Recommended articles
-
Bitcoin’s Network Statistics: Unconfirmed Transactions, Computing Power, and Difficulty Level
According to reports, according to BTC.com data, the current number of unconfirmed transactions in Bitcoin\’s entire network is 6095, with a total network comput
-
Cryptocurrency as a Scapegoat
On March 16, Cathie Wood, founder of Ark Invest, said on Twitter that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and other institutions would prevent the United
-
HashKey Group Launches Ecological Points HSK: What You Need to Know
On April 12th, HashKey Group, a digital asset financial service provider, announced the launch of the Ecological Points HSK, with a total supply of 1 billion pi
-
#South Korean Banks Given Permission to Investigate Virtual Asset Business
On April 20th, it was announced that South Korean banks may have the authority to investigate virtual asset business. According to sources from the Political Af
-
What’s wrong with a 2x fork
2x forks, what’s wrong with it? According to Cointelgraph, the Ethereum Foundation has announced that the 2x protocol upgrade has been approved. It is said that due to changes in consensus algorithms, a consensus election mechanism (Coordicide) needs to be implemented between two entities. If the community deems it necessary to modify or change rules to prevent branching, they will have to give up support for the main network. What’s wrong with the 2x protocol? 1. Why not consider improving interoperability? What are the drawbacks of a 2X fork? What’s good about a 2X fork What does forking mean?What does forking mean? What impact does it have on the network? What consequences will it lead to? This article will answer this question through a brief explanation and some conjectures What is Hardfork – making modifications, changes, or changes to code within the blockchain protocol. This is a new consensus mechanism aimed at keeping the data on the chain consistent. When…
-
What mining does CPU do (recommended CPU mining coins for 2021)
What mining does CPU do? The computing power of the CPU determines its mining ca
-
The Launch of Tetris Web3 Loyalty Program
On April 1st, the classic mobile box puzzle game \”Tetris\” announced the launch of a Web3 loyalty plan, where players can redeem real-world rewards such as Apple
-
Bank of the First Republic suspended trading and fell 67% at the beginning of the session, the largest drop on record
It is reported that the First Republic Bank of China (FRC. N) was suspended from trading and fell 67% at the beginning of the session, setting a record decline.
-
What is the National Sandbox Program (the current state of sandbox regulation in our country)
What is the National Sandbox Program? On April 6th, according to the latest news
-
Paxos Treasury Destroys 119900000 BUSDs on Ethereum Network
On March 27, according to Whale Alert monitoring, Paxos Treasury destroyed 119900000 BUSDs on the Ethereum network at 21:41:23.
Paxos destroyed 119.9 million BU