US Authorities Postpone Civil Action Against SBF

02/14/2023 22:54 • Metaverse Matters • 92 views

It is reported that a judge has approved the request of the United States Attorney for the United States Commodity Futures Commission (CFTC) to postpone the civil action against SBF. In a document submitted last week, the prosecutor asked the judge to postpone the civil fraud lawsuit filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and CFTC against SBF until the end of its criminal charges. The prosecutor said that the suspension of civil cases would save time and resources, because the results of criminal cases “may have a significant impact on the final controversial issues in civil cases”. At present, the request for postponing the SEC civil action is still pending. According to the previous news, SBF has agreed to suspend the civil case trial, and the lawyers of Gary Wang and Caroline Ellisone, other senior executives of FTX and Alameda, and the lawyers of FTX.com and Alameda’s bankruptcy property also agreed. In addition, SBF refused to plead guilty to the criminal fraud charges against him. The criminal case will be tried in October.

The judge approved to postpone the civil action of CFTC against SBF until the end of the criminal case

Analysis based on this information:

The United States Attorney for the United States Commodity Futures Commission (CFTC) has been granted the request to postpone the civil action against SBF. The prosecutor had filed a request to delay the civil fraud case filed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and CFTC against SBF. The judge approved the request citing that suspension of civil cases would save time and resources, as the results of criminal cases may significantly impact the final controversial issues in civil cases.

The postponement comes as SBF and other senior executives of FTX and Alameda have agreed to suspend the civil case trial. The lawyers of FTX.com and Alameda’s bankruptcy property also agreed to the delay. However, the request for postponing the SEC civil action is still pending.

The criminal case filed against SBF will be tried in October; however, SBF refused to plead guilty to the criminal fraud charges against him. The decision to suspend the civil case trial suggests that the authorities are focusing on prosecuting SBF in the criminal case before dealing with the civil case. This approach can have its advantages, such as the possibility of securing a guilty verdict in criminal cases, which can make it easier to win civil cases.

It is important to note that this postponement does not mean that the civil case against SBF has been dropped, but rather that it is temporarily on hold. The prosecution believes that the results of the criminal case can significantly impact the final outcome of the civil case; hence delaying it was deemed necessary. The move to suspend the civil case is a strategic one aimed at saving time and resources for the authorities.

In conclusion, the postponement of the civil case against SBF is a strategic move by the United States authorities. The decision to suspend the civil trial indicates that the criminal case has taken priority, and the authorities believe that the result of the criminal case can significantly impact the final outcome of the civil case. This approach aims to save time and resources while ensuring that justice is served.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent aiwaka's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.aiwaka.com/2023/02/14/us-authorities-postpone-civil-action-against-sbf/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.