An Open Letter to EU Authorities: The Amendment to Article 30 and Its Impact on Open-Source Contributors

According to reports, Rebecca Rettig, Chief Policy Officer of Polygon Labs, shared an open letter to EU authorities regarding the proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law: Measures for a Fair and Innovative Data Economy, which is an important document in European technology regulation. Basically, the proposed amendment aims to exclude 100% unlicensed technology and its creators (such as open-source contributors) from the scope of data regulation.

Polygon Labs sends a letter to EU authorities proposing better DeFi regulation

Introduction

In recent years, the issue of data regulation and online privacy has become increasingly important in the technology sector. With the proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law, the EU authorities are once again at the forefront of this debate. At the center of this issue is the exclusion of 100% unlicensed technology and its creators from the scope of data regulation. This article aims to explore the implications of this proposed amendment on open-source contributors and the broader technology industry.

Background

The proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law seeks to “exclude from the scope of data regulation 100% unlicensed technology and its creators, including software, applications, and other digital products that are not subject to certification.” The intention of this amendment is to encourage innovation, simplify the regulatory framework, and increase competition in the technology industry.
However, the exclusion of 100% unlicensed technology has raised concerns among open-source contributors. Open-source contributors are individuals or groups that participate in the creation, development, and distribution of open-source software. Open-source software is typically free to use, and its source code is publicly available for anyone to modify and distribute. The exclusion of 100% unlicensed technology would mean that open-source software would no longer be subject to data regulation, even if it contains personal data.

Implications for Open-Source Contributors

The exclusion of 100% unlicensed technology from the scope of data regulation would have profound implications for open-source contributors. Open-source software often contains personal data, such as email addresses, usernames, and passwords. Without data regulation, the personal data of users could be at risk of misuse, abuse, or theft.
Furthermore, the exclusion of open-source software from data regulation could lead to a lack of accountability and oversight in the technology industry. Open-source contributors could be free to create and distribute software without any checks on its security or privacy implications, potentially leaving users vulnerable to security breaches or data leaks.
The amendment could also have a chilling effect on open-source development. If open-source software is no longer subject to data regulation, it may be perceived as a less secure or trustworthy option for users. This, in turn, could lead to a decline in open-source development, as contributors may be less inclined to participate in a less regulated and more uncertain environment.

Implications for the Technology Industry

The impact of the proposed amendment extends beyond the open-source community. Excluding 100% unlicensed technology from data regulation could create a two-tiered system in the technology industry, where licensed software is subject to regulation while unlicensed software is not. This could create an uneven playing field, in which licensed developers have a competitive advantage over unlicensed developers.
Moreover, the amendment could create confusion and complexity in the regulatory framework. Defining what constitutes licensed and unlicensed software could be challenging, as many software products incorporate both licensed and open-source components. This could lead to inconsistent enforcement and hinder the development of a fair and innovative data economy.

Conclusion

The proposed amendment to Article 30 of the Data Law is a controversial issue that highlights the tension between data regulation and innovation in the technology industry. While the amendment aims to promote innovation and simplify the regulatory framework, it risks excluding open-source contributors and creating a two-tiered system in the technology industry. Further consideration is needed to ensure that any regulatory framework is fair, consistent, and inclusive for all stakeholders.

FAQs

Q. What is open-source software?
A. Open-source software is software whose source code is publicly available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute.
Q. What is the impact of the proposed amendment on open-source contributors?
A. The proposed amendment risks excluding open-source contributors from data regulation, potentially exposing users to security breaches or data leaks.
Q. How could the proposed amendment affect the technology industry?
A. The proposed amendment could create a two-tiered system in the technology industry, in which licensed developers have a competitive advantage over unlicensed developers.